Gentleman

Something funny happened today.

 

While I was riding a jeepney, a young woman on her way out dropped her handkerchief. The man across me picked it up and called the woman's attention, who was now outside the car. After telling her she dropped her handkerchief, he just threw it at her. She couldn't catch it and it fell on the dirty road. I was laughing deep inside, I let out a snort.

 

How considerate and inconsiderate of the gentleman.

 

 

Poor Man's SWTOR

Star Wars: The Old Republic, an MMORPG on the PC, went free-to-play recently much to the rejoicing of the anti-EA, anti-Bioware crowd. Well, good news for me since I used to pay and play for it.

 

When I reinstalled it to the PC, I was warned that a lot of the features I was used to would be cut and that I would need to subscribe to get them. Fair enough but goddamn, I wasn't expecting it to be so different.

 

I thought limited access to the end game content like dungeons and PVP would be enough but apparently, I need to pay for interface options like a second action bar. How am I supposed to kick ass with just one action bar? Unlike the mouth breathers that usually infest MMOs, I actually use more than two keys. I'd like to have all options on the table. Also, I need to pay to use the titles I earned, take of my helmet in cutscenes (seriously) and a bunch of other crap.

 

I know that since its free, I'm not really entitled to anything but come on, they could stand to have kept the interface stuff. Oh well.

 

Its time to rage.

Antoine Dufour - Catching the Light

Moron Dynasties

I'd like to write more about the issue of political dynasties.

 

"The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law." (Article 2, Section 26)

 

There are two things to look at. One is that political dynasties should be prohibited and the other, that equal access to opportunities for public service, be guaranteed. That guarantee is the aim of the prohibition.

 

In Fr. Bernas' commentary on the constitution, he explained that the subject of the article was a matter of serious debate. Commissioner Sarmiento, he recounts, rationalized the inclusion of the article as a means to widen the inclusion of competent, young and promising poor candidates to occupy positions in government. Though there were officials who ascended  into power despite "accident of birth", such cases were the exception and not the rule. The situation, Sarmiento lamented, was that many officials came from powerful clans with vast fortunes.

 

So the premise here, is that there are all these wonderful, perfectly capable and fine leaders who can't get elected because they can't compete with the lucky few who managed to crawl out of the right vagina. I believe that although this premise is easy to accept, it only just scratches the surface of a deeper problem.

 

The problem isn't just who we elect as leaders but who we are allowed to elect as leaders. I struggle to find ways to explain this but think of it this way; Imagine society divided by two. On the one hand are the regular Juans or the "masses" and on the other hand are the few rich families or elites.

 

Election day is coming and we need to field candidates. The elite of course, have all the money and means at their disposal and send out their sons, daughters and the endorsed cronies who ride on the coattails of the family names. This isn't a crime per se. People have a right to run for office after all. Now, what of the other half? Where are the leaders who rise from humble origins? Where are these mythical "competent, young and promising poor candidates"? Nowhere.

 

You may be thinking that, "Of course, we can't see them because they get steamrolled by the elite candidates who have more money and name recognition." But who's fault is that? Frankly, if all it takes to win an election is money and connections then its a damn embarrassment and its no damn surprise then that only those WITH money and connections can win.

 

What I'm trying to say is that elections should be more than just money and name recognition. It should be about ideas, about issues. But no, the other half composed of the starstruck masses can only respond to showbiz bullcrap and cash handouts. The "competent, young and promising poor candidates" don't exist not because the rich muscled them out but they don't exist because people don't want them. We don't respond to them because they're poor nobodies. We don't support them. We kill them.

 

Political dynasties only appear to be the problem but they aren't. The problem is that the path to power requires only those two things. Political dynasties only figure in because wealth and educational upbringing tend to be inherited. Rich families tend to breed rich and "smart" people. Even connections are inherited. A Mayor's or Governor's son can get a head start in knowing who's who very easily. They have an even bigger advantage this way and yet, people, critics of dynasties, see the advantages the elite enjoys as the problem instead of how these advantages hold such sway over the people.

 

Money and influence are a big advantage but when it's the only thing that's a factor in determining victory, then that's a problem. If only our civil society were as intelligent and mature as required by a democracy, political dynasties wouldn't be such a big deal. Imagine if people cared about ideas more than money. Imagine if competence and dedication were what people looked for in a leader instead of a familiar surname. Imagine if people wanted vision and leadership instead of platitudes are influence peddling. Now stop imagining and go back to reality. The elites, the dynasties, continue to have their way because we allow them to. Only they can produce the leaders we want but not the leaders we need. We need to change our standards. It's sad how winning elections requires so much yet demands so little.

 

The problem is us as usual.

Democracies and Dynasties

Americans just reelected Barack Obama for President of the United States of America. While I'm not a fan of Obama, the American people have spoken. It's going to be an interesting four years ahead.

Speaking of elections, if only ours were even half as exciting or interesting as the U.S. elections. It's not very exciting when it's the same familiar names running nor as interesting when we don't even talk about issues as Americans do. Nevertheless, with the Philippine Senate elections coming up in May of next year, a certain topic, that seems just as often recurring as the candidates themselves, has once again surfaced. The topic of "political dynasties".

It's funny that our constitution, as trite and verbose as it is, contains a section in article two that states quite bluntly that: "The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law." (Article 2, Section 26)

 

I'm sure the problem is obvious by just reading the article. Political dynasties are prohibited by law once they are defined by law. As of this writing, Congress has yet to pass any law defining political dynasties. It's mind-boggling how our lawmakers can rush a poorly crafted cybercrime law and railroad an impeachment complaint for a Chief Justice and yet ignore an article that has been needing a law since 1987. The problem is that political dynasties infest the political landscape of the Philippines and its stupid to expect the members of these dynasties to pass a law that would undermine the nice racket they have going on.

 

What is a political dynasty?

 

A dynasty is a succession of rulers that belong to the same family. When one mentions the word "dynasty", what often comes to mind are the kings, queens and emperors of old. I think its redundant to call a dynasty "political" since we are talking of rulers and its necessarily implied.

 

What a political dynasty, in the Philippines at least, seems to mean is when public offices are occupied by members of the same family. It could be the same office occupied by family members successively. It could mean a political unit like a province with many offices that are held mostly by members of the same family. It could mean anything until we officially define it but the common thread going through this tangled web is the idea of officials, using their advantageous position and influence, to get their family members elected or appointed to positions of power. After all, article twenty six is about equal opportunities. Which is why political dynasties are seen as an evil; the reasoning being that the family of the powerful have an advantage over regular Juans who want to run for office.

 

Its disturbing how the admirable Filipino trait of "close family ties" could be turned on it's head and corrupted.

Skyfall

I saw the new James Bond movie today. It was pretty good.

So yeah.

Oppa Gangster Style

Just recently, some Koreans in Lapu-Lapu City were almost killed in a shooting allegedly masterminded by another Korean. The motive was said to be gambling debts amounting in the millions. Weeks ago, some other Koreans were busted operating illegal internet gambling rings. Many other incidents have happened in the past of Koreans misbehaving.

 

Now, I've heard people complain about those no-good Koreans. It's easy to think of them as ingrates who come here to cause trouble but are otherwise behaved in their home country.

 

Well, that's a little unfair to the Koreans who come here for good reasons like tourism or business. A better thing to do is to ask ourselves why our cities seem to be attracting the seedier types of foreign visitors. When a person travels to another country, they are usually behaved since it's only natural to be cautious in a new environent. However, recent events have shown that the criminal elements of tourists have become more brazen.

 

Instead of blaming Koreans, we should be worried about ourselves instead, specifically our society. Why is this allowed to happen in the first place? Because they think they can get away with it. With our corrupt officials, lax law enforcement, anemic justice system and an endless supply of poor people to use and abuse, this place might look like a land of opportunity for an enterprising mob boss. Hmm, I wonder if PLDT has a computer package deal for a businessman interested in putting up an illegal online sex/gambling internet cafe...

 

Face it, they fit right in.